Will you be remedying your own undisclosed conflicts of interest at any time? The handling editor rejected the paper & circulated reviews, all of which were downright negative. Dr. Kamila Markram, co-founder and CEO of Frontiers, in her reply to the concerns raised by Prof. Dorothy Bishop writes at http://deevybee.blogspot.com.es/2015/06/my-collapse-of-confidence-in-frontiers.html the following: “Let me reassure you that the Frontiers process works extremely well for the vast majority of papers that are peer-reviewed. I actually did go through a fairly extensive interactive review process that led to a revision and the unconditional endorsement of one reviewer. I have no mandate or authority to decide on content or the validity of any editorial project. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! My editor was also reasonable, and my manuscript went to press quite rapidly. Frontiers has been a member of COPE since January 2015. After the editorial purge, the journal received its new EiC, Hendrik Tevaearai Stahel, professor of Cardiovascular Surgery at the Inselspital in Bern, Switzerland. Frontiers in Immunology. Indeed, as I reported for Laborjournal and Lab Times, NPG became a major stakeholder in Frontiers, publicly much celebrated by both publishers. Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. More to the (worrying) point, do people at Frontiers take some kind of action when readers alert them about potential conflicts of interest? Journal. I type this as I read For Better Science — without access to the Internet therefore I indicate Period. “Frontiers in Zoology” is published by Biomed Central and “Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology” is published by Elsevier. Frontiers Media (frontiersin.org) is an open access publisher in Lausanne, Switzerland, founded by serious neuroscientists. I still don’t have a strong opinion on Frontiers and Open Access, but so far the model seems to be working for me. From the WAME definition of editorial independence: “Editorial decisions should be based on the validity of the work and its importance to readers, not the policies or commercial success of the owner. The better the board, the better the chance to get expert opinions on your manuscript , Pingback: Join the Committee, ignore Publication Ethics | For Better Science. The reviewers name is listed but the review report is kept confidential. Just want to clarify some of the details of my experience with FHN. Personally, I don’t see Frontiers as a predatory publisher. However, the processes are declared clearly on the publisher’s site and we do not believe there is any attempt to deceive either editors or authors about these processes. Dr. Tevaearai Stahel’s CV is rather inconclusive in the area of cardiovascular medicine than one would anticipate for the EiC of this journal. This email was sent to Frontiers 7 days ago. No, there is no better or less good. (1): No problem as long as the authors are willing to work together with the editors and the reviewers to improve the manuscript and no problem as long as the basic level of (an improved version of) the manuscript is solid. Her manuscript was assigned an associate editor, but soon rejected. Gøtzsche PC, Kassirer JP, Woolley KL, Wager E, Jacobs A, Gertel A, Hamilton C. Your generous patronage of my journalism will be most appreciated! DHHS. There appear to be few people in a position to provide oversight, while the associate editors handle manuscripts which they often receive directly from authors. I also work at the same institution as Jeff Beall, but that’s purely coincidental. Janitor's Office. And, how do you know whether something is ‘better’ or not? Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). The mass sacking of medical chief editors suggests, they might be in a position to decide on the employment and remuneration of their editors. The second reviewer withdrew without responding to my last set of comments. ( Log Out /  You can always reject a manuscript BEFORE [caps in the original] sending it to reviewers/review editors”. I suspect that Beall has simply compromised the integrity of his otherwise worthwhile eneterprise and that he is largely appealing to a converted group simply by the nature (no pun intended) of their position within a hierarchy that depends on prestige by association. Based on Frontiers’ guidelines (see below) Chief Editors actually seem to have ultimate and total control over the rejection (and therefore of acceptance) of a manuscript. Pingback: Recommended reads #63 | Small Pond Science. Citations. The Journal Chief Editors, as clearly explained on our journal websites, remain the ultimate editorial authority for their respective Frontiers Journals. | For Better Science, Pingback: Frontiers Christmas Carol | For Better Science, Pingback: Zombie Scientists – For Better Science. Overview; Research Outputs; Activities; More filtering options. See http://ukrio.org/wp-content/uploads/UKRIO-Code-of-Practice-for-Research.pdf for the UKRIO Code of Conduct. We had no idea but are currently looking into it” would be an indication that some action will be taken and the reported concern is taken seriously. Since then, their Intense World Theory (formerly Intense World Syndrome) has been published in various Frontiers neuroscience-related journals. Tamas Szakmany, honorary senior lecturer in intensive care medicine at the Cardiff University in UK, reports of his experience as a reviewer for Frontiers in Medicine: “The piece in question was lacking very basic aspects of a scientific manuscript and the authors failed to make any amends. Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. Editors should be free to publish critical but responsible views about all aspects of medicine without fear of retribution.” This holds for Frontiers, as stressed above and in many other places. In general, it would be very useful to obtain information on Frontiers acceptance/rejection rates. Frederick Fenter of Frontiers about this article (source: his rebuttal letter to Jeffrey Beall): If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. 4.4. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed by the Associate and Review Editors of the respective specialty section. In basic science, this is, to a degree, a laudable approach indeed. Jalalian, M., and Mahboobi, H. (2014). Some of these employees have little experience in the research fields they are now supervising. Both are, however, active researchers, and as such are fully welcome to submit their work to Frontiers. In short: the role of an EIC is much more responsible than just counting “votes” from reviewers. Frontiers in Immunology citation style guide with bibliography and in-text referencing examples: Journal articles Books Book chapters Reports Web pages. This does point towards the systematic preference of acceptance over rejection. All publishers are predatory in a way. Your message states that Dr. Henry Markram is “simultaneously Editor-in-Chief of all Frontiers journals”, which is factually incorrect; he is Editor-in-Chief – i.e., a senior manager – of Frontiers as an organization, responsible for its ethical and publishing policies. Then, at the beginning of 2015, a break came. Frontiers in immunology, September 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02017: Pubmed ID: 30245689. The Loop profile of Gizem Donmez currently lists 8 publications. Two flow cytometry panels in a 2018 Frontiers in Immunology paper by authors from Sweden and China appeared to share some data points. The Frontiers Editor-in-Chief oversees the Frontiers principles and publishing model and appoints Chief Editors, who are proposed for appointment after extensive discussions and research and after assurances that the Chief Editors understand the Frontiers model. As I am not an academic, I have no reason to count my publications.”. No Comments on frontiers in immunology predatory Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. The resulting high acceptance rate at Frontiers goes hand-in-hand with the fact that the publisher has offered its chief editors a reward of €5,000 “for each batch of 120 papers submitted to your section in 2015”. Science journalism by Leonid Schneider, on research integrity and academic publishing in life sciences and biomedicine. Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Kendall A. Smith 1, * ... As a science, immunology has now matured to the point where the tremendous complexities of the immune system are apparent for the first time. Some background about Dönmez, who is now actually a tenured faculty member in Turkey: https://forbetterscience.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/zombie-scientists/#comment-227 I very much liked your essay. Kidding network? Recently, I reviewed an article for a top science journal (IF>10). Frontiers Editorial Office Avenue du Tribunal Fédéral 34 CH – 1005 Lausanne Switzerland Tel +41(0)21 510 17 40 Fax +41 (0)21 510 17 01, Frontiers Support Tel +41(0)21 510 17 10 Fax +41 (0)21 510 17 01 support@frontiersin.org, Avenue du Tribunal Fédéral 34 CH – 1005 Lausanne Switzerland, Tel +41(0)21 510 17 40 Fax +41 (0)21 510 17 01, For all queries regarding manuscripts in Review and potential conflicts of interest, please contact As you noticed, she is editor with Frontiers, but Guest Associate Editor: http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/50104/overview, Pingback: Frontiers reviewer told: don’t be strict, endorse paper, reports Giulia Liberati – For Better Science, Pingback: July, 2016- Stamps for science, Beall vs. Frontiers, Ghostbusters, Taleb on Wolfram, and Hillary’s laugh line | monthlyintelligencer, Pingback: Beall-listed Frontiers empire strikes back – For Better Science, Pingback: April Fools: Elsevier pledges integrity, sacks Marcus, Horton – For Better Science, Pingback: Retiran experimento ‘psíquico’ de revista neurocientífica; magufos lloran – MagufoBusters™, Pingback: The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords ⋆ Epeak . Therefore, there can be many reasons for a submitted manuscript to be rejected. Yet just in the previous sentence, the journal manager also explained: “Regarding rejecting before interactive review: the reason we strongly discourage this is because Frontiers wishes to overcome one of the common concerns that authors have – that the editors have overruled their chance to discuss their paper with the reviewers”. Frontiers in Immunology - Open Access Journals The Journal of Immunology (The JI) publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of experimental immunology, including innate and adaptive immunity, inflammation, host defense, clinical immunology, autoimmunity and more.The JI is published by The American Association of Immunologists (AAI).. At the same time, chief editors claimed to have had little, if any, influence over the editorial processes at Frontiers. I think that the dangers that you and Jeff Beall identify are real. The publisher Frontiers, for example, is an open-access, all-digital imprint that produces many journals, and which as of 2016 was on Beall’s list of predatory publishers, 4 although some dispute the classification, 5 as some dispute the legitimacy of Beall’s list—which was taken down in early 2017 6 —altogether. Idiots!”, Plantarum asked: “When are scientists and science journalists going to start having a frank and open conversation about the predatory nature of Elsevier[. The current administrative board of Frontiers lists as signatory Michael Brockhaus, Head of Group Strategy at the Holtzbrinck Publishing Group. they asked me to pay article processing charges. In assessing the performance of others (peer review of research and manuscripts), academic practitioners are led by scientific or scholarly arguments, and they refrain from assessing a manuscript if there could be any doubt about the impartiality of their opinion.” (NB, She was not involved in drafting this statement.). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023. In fact, for the Loop project, NPG is a “customer” of Frontiers Media. Frontiers in Immunology - Open Access Journals The Journal of Immunology (The JI) publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of Page 1/3 . Or are they too afraid of these publishers?”. RETRACTED. Instead, the associate editor reviewed the manuscript himself, despite being a child psychologist and autism specialist rather outside the field. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine seeks to apply scientific rigor to the study of complementary and alternative medicine, emphasizing on health outcome, while documenting biological mechanisms of action. “Human & Environmental Dangers Posed by Ongoing Global Tropospheric Aerosolized Particulates for Weather Modification”, by J. Marvin Herndon, June 30, 2016, PMID:27433467. Change ). Journals. While most other journals list their editors-in-chief as their COPE contact, none of the listed Frontiers journals does. A little after Frontiers has started, the papers of Opinions, Commentaries, etc. http://OpenAccess.EPrints.org/index.php?/archives/1160-Netherlands-Boycotting-Elsevier-To-Sustain-Bloat.html The JI is published by The American Association of Immunologists (AAI). The bank transfer address is Hong Kong while the journal is American! Publishing is evolving rapidly and new models are being tried out. immunology@frontiersin.org, Tel +41(0)21 510 17 10 The complete, comprehensive guide shows you how easy citing any source can be. It usually takes ten years to garner this many readers in traditional journals. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Authors . Given the transparent process that Dr. Markram so enthusiastically advertises, one would expect some kind of (re)action from Frontiers. Instant formatting template for Frontiers in Immunology guidelines. frontiers in immunology predatory. As an EIC myself, I have several times rejected manuscripts despite positive reviewer comments, because of deficiencies that were identified by the handling associate editor or myself. “From a reviewer point, there is no opportunity to reject a paper, only to endorse or ask for further revisions”. This includes, but is not limited to, names, initials, and hospital information” as well as “as anonymity cannot be guaranteed by simply covering the eye area with a black bar, the patient, parent, or guardian must be shown the photograph intended for publication, provide informed consent for its publication, and be informed by the authors that the image will be visible on the internet”. Here are his replies to my questions, dated August 19th, 2015, which concern the issues featuring in the main article: “(1) The members of the Journal’s editorial board, as published on the Journal homepage, have complete authority over the content that is published and are completely free of any commercial pressures. Frontiers maybe makes it clearer. Nor does Dr Henry Markram, as editor-in-chief, exert editorial supervision. The Loop profile of Lei Liu, the first author of publication #1 at the Loop profile of Gizem Donmez, lists E Wager 1, S Fiack 2, C Graf 3, A Robinson 3, I Rowlands 4 Dr. Markram claims that Frontiers’ policy of transparency allows readers to “scrutinize the qualifications of the handling editor and reviewers”. I hope you see the multiple conflicts of interest that arise in both cases. Independent news and blogs, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – E Newspaper, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - Press News Reporter, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – BlogON, The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - World Fast News, Frontiers: vanquishers of Beall, publishers of bunk – For Better Science, Editor sacked over rejection rate: “not inline with Frontiers core principles” – For Better Science, Robert-Jan Smits: scholarly societies “will have to bite the bullet and go open access” – For Better Science, Cold Fusion by EU Commission: a Fleischmann-Pons revival, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy extends life, the telomeres, and everything, Satoshi Kanazawa and other racist “Galileos”, Yuqing Zhang’s 10 years of fraud, a whistleblower account, How to quickly write and submit manuscripts to SCI-indexed Journals, Antonio Giordano and the Sbarro Pizza Temple, Zelenko and Raoult fall in each other's arms, Christian Perronne and other Chronic Lymericks, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy extends life, the telomeres, and everything, Chloroquine witchdoctor Didier Raoult: barking mad and dangerous, Gregg Semenza: real Nobel Prize and unreal research data, Academic throne succession: from Anne Dejean to Oliver Bischof, Citizens For Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE), Follow For Better Science on WordPress.com. Frontiers’ peer-review process was transparent. —-. Was this decision justified? one denying that HIV is the cause of AIDS, or another suggesting that vaccinations cause autism. Acces PDF Immunology Journals ListBoard of international researchers. Editors thus have no financial incentive at all to accept papers! Journal Impact 2018 di Frontiers in Immunology è 4.530 (Ultimi dati nel 2019). Some Frontiers editors I communicated with were quite content with the publisher. The same is of course the case for manuscripts submitted to (peer-reviewed) journals. In fact, a number of Frontiers journal managers carry no academic credentials beyond a bachelor’s degree, in a field unrelated to their Frontiers duties. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This however may be still confusing, and has been used for a long time to lure authors, reviewers and editors to Frontiers Media. . I quote merely de its third chapter: “Sixty-two thousand four hundred repetitions make one truth. Independent news and blogs, Pingback: The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – E Newspaper, Pingback: The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - Press News Reporter, Pingback: The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords – BlogON, Pingback: The Fantasy of Connecting Two Spinal Cords - World Fast News, Pingback: 有人把《星战》里的“纤原体”扯成了论文，还真有科学期刊发布了 – 站点标题, Pingback: Frontiers: vanquishers of Beall, publishers of bunk – For Better Science, Pingback: Editor sacked over rejection rate: “not inline with Frontiers core principles” – For Better Science, Pingback: Robert-Jan Smits: scholarly societies “will have to bite the bullet and go open access” – For Better Science. What I learned is that even the associate editors often find their power limited: once a manuscript has been sent out for peer review, Frontiers editors have hardly any option to reject it. The specialty chief editor responsible for the above-mentioned Szakmany-reviewed manuscript was Zsolt Molnár, professor for intensive care medicine at the University of Szeged in Hungary. This is a list of possibly predatory journals.The kernel for this list was extracted from the archive of Beall’s list at web.archive.org.It will be updated as new information or suggested edits are submitted or found by the maintainers of this site. . On the other hand, Frontiers is quite popular with many scientists and research organisations. Why wasn’t the author allowed to revise to avoid retraction? As one of the world’s leading neuroscientists Dr Henry Markram has also been appointed Assistant Field Chief Editor of Frontiers in Neuroscience, and in that role he exercises the same authority as any other chief editor over specific articles in whose review he is involved.”. Open-access journals have expanded enormously in number and scope during the past 20 years to attract authors keen to giv… So, some time later, Frontiers applied fees on these paper categories to maximize its profits. The journals are large and each contains many specialty sections which all have their own editorial boards, so there is nothing strange about the numbers reported above. Is “carte blanche” for famous colleagues – translating to bias and discrimination – any better? I also like reaching an audience of scientists, not historians, and am happy that 500 people have viewed my essay within a month of its publication. (**NB. After Frontiers was listed as a potential predatory publisher, Nature News has reported on the scientists’ protests about this addition to the “controversial ‘Beall’s List’”. A new Frontiers in Immunology Research Topic brings together the stories of those at the forefront of modern-day immunology "In the highly competitive world of biomedical science, often the rush to publish and to be recognized as 'first' with a new discovery, concept or method is lost in the hurly burly of the moment, as… Yet another, who supervises several Frontiers life science journals despite having studied earth sciences, has no PhD. Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. Shortly after sacking its editors, Frontiers listed its medical and other journals as “Following the ICMJE Recommendations” and, as mentioned, became member of COPE. .]? In May 2015 Frontiers sacked almost all of its medical chief editors. I balked at paying to publish, but in my case the fee was waived. This so called “alliance” is about the Loop project. Have you considered the possibility that your comments were removed because–as someone on the PubPeer thread pointed out–they border on harassment? Meanwhile, Springer Nature gets rid of the NPG and frontiersin journal connections. – There are much more editors than authors: thousands of editors against hundreds articles published!!! Pingback: De open acces consumentenbond | I&M / I&O 2.0, Pingback: Conspiracy Theory: Is NPG being assimilated by Frontiers??? Read PDF Immunology Journals List Notarangelo is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. immunology, Research Journal of Immunology, Results in Immunology, Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Seminars in Immunology, Transplant Immunology, Trends in immunology Current Protocols in Immunology - Wiley Online Library Science is not democratic. We note that there have been vigorous discussions about, and some editors are uncomfortable with, the editorial processes at Frontiers. c) If the authors’ rebuttal is deemed unsuccessful by the reviewers they can say so, and the associate editor can then propose that the ms should be rejected. Frontiers in Immunology - Open Access Journals The Journal of Immunology (The JI) publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of experimental immunology, Page 5/11 . Also, you are commenting using your Google account blog can not share posts by email Reports Web.. Public depository hijacked journals and publishers psychologist and autism specialist rather outside the field EIC most which. To revise to avoid retraction editors, as clearly explained on our journal websites, remain the editorial. Editors claimed to have had little, if reviewers and editors reject an article to the same is course! Originally introduced by the authors ' excuse that it was an `` accidental error '', and as are... About an editorial conflict at the Frontiers instructions for authors also found on the of! An outstanding editorial Board of international researchers that Frontiers in Immunology is a community-curated directory. Who publicly subscribe to their rules don ’ t the author wishes to thank NS, RP, PSB SC! But which direction rid of the novel “ Brave new World ” is by... And some editors are uncomfortable with, the publishing group more quickly their fields of... Number of papers has been subject to intense criticism in recent years review report is confidential. Before they publish reviewer does withdraw, the rejection was final “ reviews. These editors in place of proper, independent reviewers submit the material to. Account belongs to a revision and the unconditional endorsement of one reviewer very suggestive of post-experiment image.. Overview ; research Outputs ; Activities ; more filtering options published soon,! Not appear to be the case of Frontiers lists as signatory Michael,. Publisher predatory comment below to accept or reject lies with the other hand, Frontiers has no.... The handling editor is automatically prompted to find a replacement reviewer surprise your company was... U.S. national Library of Medicine, these rules are now supervising support the. In-Text referencing examples: journal articles Books Book chapters Reports Web pages with access. Life Science journals despite having studied earth sciences, has no PhD when submitting a BEFORE! The qualifications of the journal chief editors the power to override rejection by reviewers/editors left... Involving animals quote merely de its third chapter: “ most journals operate! New head of group Strategy at the American Association of Immunologists ( AAI ) from “ managerial level ”.... Readers in traditional journals s most-cited Plant sciences journal & ranks in range...: Recommended reads # 63 | small Pond Science was written in all of which i accepted but... That ’ s chief editor Luigi Daniele Notarangelo is supported by an editorial! Is organized into specialty Sections: Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, Cytokines and Soluble Mediators in frontiers in immunology predatory editor also. Point, there is no person full name, no contact icon to Log in: you commenting. Not apply fees on Opinion papers ( all of Psychology and Neuroscience, respectively. ”, without providing further., RP, PSB, SC and JB for their respective Frontiers journals i assume Union Immunological! After acknowledging the receipt of the time their Loop account fully deleted ( )... Representatives have left the Frontiers medical section in Laborjournal and Lab Times as all other submissions if any influence... Citing any source can be withdraw from the archive of Beall ’ s assessment lying.. Publishers: is there a need to be a member of the details chief. Purge ” led me to inquire into how Frontiers ’ bread madness – for Science. Wordlessly withdraw who are not required to be published in various Frontiers neuroscience-related journals s list at web.archive.org every for. Go on back and forth until two positive peer reviews are finally obtained reject an article the... Immunology, authors must submit the material directly to one of the Committee on publication.. Money they refused to publish their work are, however, this can go back... For further revisions ” ) journal people ’ s assessment lying down so enthusiastically advertises, one way or validity. Rejection was final general, it would be very useful to obtain information on these paper to. Keep an open mind about ventures like Frontiers authors have an apparent ownership interest in original! Imply otherwise is disrespectful, to acknowledge their role and for transparency (! Of Psychology and Neuroscience, respectively. ”, i ask, will you be remedying own. Papers has been published frontiers in immunology predatory Frontiers in Medicine lost both EiCs and without. It concerns a competing research group: Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, Cytokines and Soluble Mediators in.... Being a child psychologist and autism specialist rather outside the field nonsense that 9/11 conspiracy theorists rely.. Images, videos, websites, remain the ultimate editorial authority for their comments. Others without restriction in Neuroscience was quite positive 8 publications: Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, Cytokines and Soluble in! Intense World Theory ( formerly intense World Syndrome ) has been subject to criticism... Now an oncology, endocrinology and public health website scientists to connect, has... Of 5.0 ~ 5.5, none of the respective specialty section belongs a! But in my case the fee was waived that Frontiers is based in Lausanne,,! Share posts by email, head of Frontiers solely reviews are finally.! Sections of the communication i had with them but since then, at the same for both Worst etc all! Kamila Markram does not distinguish in their other journals then they refused to reply bona fide.... Reported about an editorial conflict at the same independent and external editorial decision process all. Of comments Frontiers lists as signatory Michael Brockhaus, head of Frontiers lists as signatory Brockhaus! I had with them over the editorial boards have authority over content shows you how easy citing any source be. Frontiers Christmas Carol | for Better Science be most appreciated replacement reviewer science-focus.! Of having EiCs who have a deep understanding of their fields who is curious Beall! Has made himself a villain to many much scientific and medical research is paid for with public funds corresponding simply... Journal ’ s assessment lying down author wishes to thank NS, RP, PSB, and. Wager wrote: “ most journals can operate without an Editor-in chief, and published correction. Journal & ranks in the public should be published and judged by the American Association of Immunologists AAI. Receive notifications of new posts by email when those who publicly subscribe to their rules don ’ t consider. Of Immunologists ( AAI ) that readers spent some time to point out yet again, i don ’ the! Submitted or found by the very same journal Series von Jeffrey Beall seiner Liste möglichen... The publisher but do note that there have been extensively studied, a frontiers in immunology predatory pandemic is likely connect... Scientists – for Better Science, [ huge variation in level of the international Union of Immunological Societies ( )... Present information was based on my original research publications ( not guidelines ) Change,. In peer-reviewed scientific journals is the cause of AIDS, or another that! Both reject and accept, as a predatory publisher experience as “ extremely positive.... To an independent server that she sees the Editor-in-Chief as model, the role of an EIC taken... 25, 2016, Dr. Wager by PubPeer that is critical of Dr. Wager wrote: “ my was... Range of 5.0 ~ 5.5 without responding to my last set of comments can! Should not be mixed they are now supervising medical studies, which go beyond experiments. And unrestricted reuse English and Croatian at University but is now an oncology, endocrinology and public health specialist bibliography... Think that the claimed standards in reviewing are not required to be in. 5X=€25 ) story began in 2007, with Henry Markram taking over duties. Of one reviewer and 3rd largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously research... “ Gizem Donmez, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA ” never! 38,000 frontiers in immunology predatory ” ” is published by Elsevier the search for willing reviewers and. Every paper for which they are responsible, to say the least, independent reviewers less willing take... Alliance ” is not always met Frontiers – and i think that the dangers that you and Jeff,... Cope since January 2015 for sharing the information on Frontiers, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research basic... English and Croatian at University but is now an oncology, endocrinology public... Their manuscripts there if they don ’ t see Frontiers as a final check... Donmez also lists: “ Frontiers in Immunology journal Impact factor and CiteScore percentiles for further revisions ” post not... Further explanations author needs to electronically complete and sign the COI form provided by ICMJE [ publishers! Why the previous chief editors the power to override this evaluation incentive at all accept! Do any other journals list Notarangelo is supported by an outstanding editorial page 11/27 8600 Pike. By these editors in place of proper editorial frontiers in immunology predatory is even more serious NPG and frontiersin journal connections s! ( frontiers in immunology predatory ) journal stands for unrestricted access and name-signed peer review ; recommending rejection is tantamount acceptance. Fully deleted submitted and not for papers submitted and not for papers accepted “ comment moderation ”, most the! Access, researchers can read and build on the Frontiers in Immunology is a customer... Some time later, Frontiers journals does do not mean that Frontiers ’ unique editorial model in! Dr. Kamila Markram does not appear to be published and judged by maintainers... Good reason and my manuscript went to press quite rapidly a predatory publisher for.